Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs XLG: how they differ
COWZ and XLG hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and XLG hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Verizon Communications Inc | 1.90% | 0.55% |
| AT&T Inc | 1.84% | 0.49% |
| Salesforce Inc | 1.76% | 0.45% |
| Intuit Inc | 1.63% | 0.29% |
| Adobe Inc | 1.75% | 0.27% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in XLG |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | NVIDIA Corp. 13.10% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | Apple Inc. 10.76% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | Microsoft Corp. 8.18% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Amazon.com, Inc. 6.99% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | Alphabet Inc. 6.05% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | Broadcom Inc. 4.85% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | Alphabet Inc. 4.82% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | Meta Platforms, Inc. 3.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | Invesco |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | S&P 500 top 50 |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +12.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −5.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 100 | 51 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLG in plain words
XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 51 positions, with the top ten at 63.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or XLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and XLG returned +12.2%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or XLG?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so XLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against XLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-XLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources