Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs VOE: how they differ

COWZ and VOE hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VOE hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and VOE both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZVOE
Valero Energy Corp1.48%1.34%
Marathon Petroleum Corp1.78%1.29%
SLB Ltd1.84%1.21%
Target Corp1.07%1.03%
Delta Air Lines Inc1.48%1.01%
PACCAR Inc0.99%1.10%
Corteva Inc0.98%0.99%
Cardinal Health Inc1.62%0.96%
Ford Motor Co2.01%0.94%
Cencora Inc1.03%0.91%
Newmont Corp1.93%0.86%
Devon Energy Corp1.09%0.83%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in VOE
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%Cummins Inc 1.71%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%CRH PLC 1.24%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%United Rentals Inc 1.23%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%General Motors Co 1.21%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Simon Property Group Inc 1.20%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Phillips 66 1.18%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Warner Bros Discovery Inc 1.10%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.90%Digital Realty Trust Inc 1.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

COWZ and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerVanguard
What it isUS Cash Cows 100Mid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+20.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+2.7 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%96.6%
Holdings100170

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VOE?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and VOE returned +20.2%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VOE?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and VOE charges 0.05%, so VOE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 97% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against VOE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against VOE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-VOE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources