Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs VO: how they differ

COWZ and VO hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VO hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and VO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZVO
Valero Energy Corp1.48%0.75%
Marathon Petroleum Corp1.78%0.72%
SLB Ltd1.84%0.67%
PACCAR Inc0.99%0.61%
Target Corp1.07%0.57%
Delta Air Lines Inc1.48%0.57%
Corteva Inc0.98%0.55%
Cardinal Health Inc1.62%0.54%
Ford Motor Co2.01%0.53%
Cencora Inc1.03%0.51%
Newmont Corp1.93%0.48%
Devon Energy Corp1.09%0.46%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in VO
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%Vertiv Holdings Co 1.23%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%Western Digital Corp 1.07%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.05%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Quanta Services Inc 1.05%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.04%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Cummins Inc 0.95%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Datadog Inc 0.84%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.90%Bloom Energy Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

COWZ and VO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerVanguard
What it isUS Cash Cows 100Mid-Cap
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+12.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts−5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%91.4%
Holdings100282

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VO in plain words

VO is an index equity fund tracking the Mid-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 282 positions, with the top ten at 9.6%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and VO returned +12.0%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or VO?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and VO charges 0.03%, so VO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and VO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 91% of VO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against VO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against VO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-VO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources