Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs VB: how they differ
COWZ and VB hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and VB hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | VB |
|---|---|---|
| Jabil Inc | 0.55% | 0.49% |
| Twilio Inc | 0.36% | 0.38% |
| Tapestry Inc | 0.55% | 0.36% |
| Williams-Sonoma Inc | 0.35% | 0.33% |
| Illumina Inc | 0.31% | 0.31% |
| F5 Inc | 0.32% | 0.29% |
| United Therapeutics Corp | 0.41% | 0.28% |
| Expand Energy Corp | 0.52% | 0.27% |
| JB Hunt Transport Services Inc | 0.37% | 0.27% |
| Omnicom Group Inc | 0.84% | 0.25% |
| Incyte Corp | 0.44% | 0.23% |
| Viatris Inc | 0.65% | 0.23% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in VB |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 0.55% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 0.46% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | Astera Labs Inc 0.45% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Natera Inc 0.45% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | EMCOR Group Inc 0.45% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | NRG Energy Inc 0.38% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | MKS Instruments Inc 0.37% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | Flex Ltd 0.36% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | VB Vanguard Small-Cap Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | Vanguard |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Small-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +15.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −2.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.03% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 21.7% |
| Holdings | 100 | 1311 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VB in plain words
VB is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1311 positions, with the top ten at 4.3%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or VB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and VB returned +15.2%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or VB?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and VB charges 0.03%, so VB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and VB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 22% of VB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against VB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-VB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources