Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs SCHD: how they differ

COWZ and SCHD hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and SCHD hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZSCHD
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%6.75%
Altria Group Inc2.21%2.94%
ConocoPhillips2.17%3.52%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co2.03%2.94%
Verizon Communications Inc1.90%3.66%
SLB Ltd1.84%2.06%
Ford Motor Co2.01%1.72%
Comcast Corp1.71%2.25%
United Parcel Service Inc1.69%1.99%
Automatic Data Processing Inc1.31%2.25%
EOG Resources Inc1.23%1.82%
Devon Energy Corp1.09%1.29%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in SCHD
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Texas Instruments Inc 5.92%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.10%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%
Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99%Merck & Co Inc 3.87%
Newmont Corp 1.93%Chevron Corp 3.84%
Booking Holdings Inc 1.87%Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%
AT&T Inc 1.84%Amgen Inc 3.48%
Gilead Sciences Inc 1.84%PepsiCo Inc 3.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

COWZ and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerSchwab
What it isUS Cash Cows 100US dividend
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%95.1%
Holdings10099

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or SCHD?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 25% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources