Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs RSP: how they differ
COWZ and RSP hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and RSP hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | RSP |
|---|---|---|
| ON Semiconductor Corp | 0.84% | 0.33% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 2.67% | 0.26% |
| Jabil Inc | 0.55% | 0.26% |
| JB Hunt Transport Services Inc | 0.37% | 0.23% |
| SLB Ltd | 1.84% | 0.23% |
| Halliburton Co | 0.69% | 0.23% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 1.99% | 0.23% |
| CDW Corp/DE | 0.40% | 0.22% |
| Delta Air Lines Inc | 1.48% | 0.22% |
| Coterra Energy Inc | 0.63% | 0.22% |
| VeriSign Inc | 0.39% | 0.22% |
| Devon Energy Corp | 1.09% | 0.22% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in RSP |
|---|---|
| Accenture PLC 1.68% | Intel Corp. 0.38% |
| Zoom Communications Inc 0.80% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.34% |
| Tenet Healthcare Corp 0.63% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 0.33% |
| Flex Ltd 0.59% | Sandisk Corp. 0.32% |
| TechnipFMC PLC 0.58% | Western Digital Corp. 0.31% |
| SS&C Technologies Holdings Inc 0.44% | Ciena Corp. 0.30% |
| United Therapeutics Corp 0.41% | Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 0.29% |
| Twilio Inc 0.36% | Centene Corp. 0.29% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | RSP Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | Invesco |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | S&P 500 equal weight |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +14.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −2.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.20% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 99.1% |
| Holdings | 100 | 503 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
RSP in plain words
RSP is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 equal weight. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 503 positions, with the top ten at 3.2%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or RSP?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and RSP returned +14.8%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or RSP?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and RSP charges 0.20%, so RSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and RSP overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 99% of RSP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against RSP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-RSP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources