Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs QUAL: how they differ

COWZ and QUAL hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and QUAL hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZQUAL
SLB Ltd1.84%1.56%
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%1.42%
Adobe Inc1.75%1.19%
Automatic Data Processing Inc1.31%0.88%
DR Horton Inc1.21%0.76%
Diamondback Energy Inc1.99%0.66%
Halliburton Co0.69%0.60%
Devon Energy Corp1.09%0.51%
PulteGroup Inc0.58%0.50%
Newmont Corp1.93%0.42%
Autodesk Inc0.72%0.36%
Williams-Sonoma Inc0.35%0.59%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in QUAL
Altria Group Inc 2.21%NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.52%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%APPLE INC. 6.28%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%MICROSOFT CORPORATION 5.05%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%META PLATFORMS, INC. 3.50%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%VISA INC. 3.09%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.90%ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPaceriShares
What it isUS Cash Cows 100MSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%98.9%
Holdings100121

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or QUAL?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 11% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources