Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs QQQ: how they differ

COWZ and QQQ hold 7% of their weight in the same names.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and QQQ hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and QQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZQQQ
QUALCOMM Inc2.67%1.18%
T-Mobile US Inc1.78%0.91%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.84%0.73%
Booking Holdings Inc1.87%0.58%
Adobe Inc1.75%0.46%
Intuit Inc1.63%0.40%
Automatic Data Processing Inc1.31%0.39%
Comcast Corp1.71%0.39%
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc1.17%0.28%
PACCAR Inc0.99%0.26%
Airbnb Inc1.62%0.25%
Diamondback Energy Inc1.99%0.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in QQQ
Altria Group Inc 2.21%NVIDIA Corp. 8.16%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Apple Inc. 7.29%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%Microsoft Corp. 5.32%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Micron Technology, Inc. 4.80%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%Amazon.com, Inc. 4.62%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.70%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%Alphabet Inc. 3.52%
Newmont Corp 1.93%Tesla, Inc. 3.46%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

COWZ and QQQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPacerInvesco
What it isUS Cash Cows 100Nasdaq-100, book from QQQM
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+23.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+5.5 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%96.7%
Holdings100101

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

QQQ in plain words

QQQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq-100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 47.5%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or QQQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and QQQ returned +23.0%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or QQQ?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, so QQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and QQQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 97% of QQQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against QQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against QQQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-QQQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources