Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and MUB returned +0.1%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, COWZ or MUB?

COWZ charges 0.49% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs MUB: how they differ

COWZ and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZ	Only in MUB
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

COWZ and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Pacer	iShares
What it is	US Cash Cows 100	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.4%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.9 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.05%
Holdings	100	6603

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and MUB returned +0.1%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or MUB?: COWZ charges 0.49% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources