Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs MOAT: how they differ
COWZ and MOAT hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and MOAT hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | MOAT |
|---|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co | 2.03% | 2.43% |
| Airbnb Inc | 1.62% | 2.56% |
| Constellation Brands Inc | 0.63% | 2.32% |
| Copart Inc | 0.41% | 2.01% |
| Veeva Systems Inc | 0.36% | 2.41% |
| Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc | 0.33% | 2.30% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in MOAT |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | Masco Corp 2.96% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | Kenvue Inc 2.59% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Brown-Forman Corp 2.49% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | NVIDIA Corp 2.45% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | Datadog Inc 2.44% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99% | Broadcom Inc 2.43% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | VanEck |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Morningstar Wide Moat |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +11.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | −6.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.46% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 91.6% |
| Holdings | 100 | 55 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
MOAT in plain words
MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or MOAT?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or MOAT?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so MOAT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources