Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, COWZ or IUSB?

COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs IUSB: how they differ

COWZ and IUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZ	Only in IUSB
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%	United States of America 0.38%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%	United States of America 0.37%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%	United States of America 0.37%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%	United States of America 0.37%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%	United States of America 0.36%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%	United States of America 0.36%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%	United States of America 0.36%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%	United States of America 0.35%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and IUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF	IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Pacer	iShares
What it is	US Cash Cows 100	Core Universal USD Bond
Total return, 1 year	+23.4%	−0.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	+5.9 pts	−17.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.49%	0.06%
Holdings	100	17819

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IUSB in plain words

IUSB is a bond fund tracking the Core Universal USD Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and IUSB returned −0.3%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or IUSB?: COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IUSB charges 0.06%, so IUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against IUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against IUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-IUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources