Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs IBB: how they differ
COWZ and IBB hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and IBB returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares Biotechnology ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and IBB hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | COWZ | IBB |
|---|---|---|
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 1.84% | 6.85% |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc | 1.17% | 4.91% |
| Biogen Inc | 0.67% | 2.47% |
| Incyte Corp | 0.44% | 1.75% |
| United Therapeutics Corp | 0.41% | 1.74% |
| Illumina Inc | 0.31% | 2.07% |
| Only in COWZ | Only in IBB |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | Vertex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 8.09% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | Amgen, Inc. 7.84% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | Argenx SE 3.76% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 3.12% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | Natera, Inc. 2.89% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | Revolution Medicines, Inc. 2.78% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | Moderna, Inc. 1.99% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | Insmed, Inc. 1.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | IBB iShares Biotechnology ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | iShares |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Biotechnology |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +41.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | +24.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.44% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 35.6% |
| Holdings | 100 | 248 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IBB in plain words
IBB is an index equity fund tracking the Biotechnology. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +41.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 36% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 248 positions, with the top ten at 44.8%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or IBB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and IBB returned +41.5%, so IBB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or IBB?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and IBB charges 0.44%, so IBB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and IBB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 36% of IBB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against IBB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-IBB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources