Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs FXI: how they differ

COWZ and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in FXI
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66%
Altria Group Inc 2.21%CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72%
CVS Health Corp 2.16%INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%MEITUAN 4.79%
Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41%
Pfizer Inc 2.00%BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and FXI on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPaceriShares
What it isUS Cash Cows 100China Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year+23.4%−13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts−31.3 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.73%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%0.0%
Holdings10052

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FXI in plain words

FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or FXI?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and FXI returned −13.8%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or FXI?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against FXI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources