Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
COWZ vs EFA: how they differ
COWZ and EFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and EFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in COWZ | Only in EFA |
|---|---|
| QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% | ASML Holding N.V. 2.60% |
| Altria Group Inc 2.21% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47% |
| ConocoPhillips 2.17% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.36% |
| CVS Health Corp 2.16% | Novartis AG 1.30% |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% | Nestle S.A. 1.21% |
| Ford Motor Co 2.01% | SHELL PLC 1.20% |
| Uber Technologies Inc 2.01% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05% |
| Pfizer Inc 2.00% | COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.
| COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Pacer | iShares |
| What it is | US Cash Cows 100 | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | +23.4% | +18.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +5.9 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.49% | 0.32% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 95.8% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 100 | 705 |
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or EFA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and EFA returned +18.2%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, COWZ or EFA?
- COWZ charges 0.49% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do COWZ and EFA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 0% of EFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against EFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-EFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources