Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

COWZ vs DYNF: how they differ

COWZ and DYNF hold 6% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COWZ and DYNF hold 6% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions COWZ and DYNF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCOWZDYNF
AT&T Inc1.84%1.03%
Verizon Communications Inc1.90%0.87%
Salesforce Inc1.76%0.86%
Booking Holdings Inc1.87%0.57%
Newmont Corp1.93%0.50%
Gilead Sciences Inc1.84%0.42%
Pfizer Inc2.00%0.24%
HCA Healthcare Inc1.65%0.23%
Cardinal Health Inc1.62%0.20%
McKesson Corp1.79%0.17%
Comcast Corp1.71%0.14%
Automatic Data Processing Inc1.31%0.13%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in COWZOnly in DYNF
QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%NVIDIA Corp 8.62%
ConocoPhillips 2.17%Apple Inc 7.75%
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%Microsoft Corp 5.35%
Ford Motor Co 2.01%Amazon.com Inc 4.42%
Diamondback Energy Inc 1.99%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.59%
SLB Ltd 1.84%Broadcom Inc 3.25%
T-Mobile US Inc 1.78%Alphabet Inc 2.87%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.78%Cisco Systems Inc 2.76%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

COWZ and DYNF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
DYNF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerPaceriShares
What it isUS Cash Cows 100U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active
Total return, 1 year+23.4%+20.8%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+5.9 pts+3.3 pts
Expense ratio0.49%0.26%
Already in the S&P 50095.8%98.8%
Holdings100187

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

DYNF in plain words

DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, COWZ or DYNF?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, COWZ returned +23.4% and DYNF returned +20.8%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, COWZ or DYNF?
COWZ charges 0.49% a year and DYNF charges 0.26%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do COWZ and DYNF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of COWZ and 99% of DYNF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 6% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

COWZ against DYNF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, COWZ against DYNF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/COWZ-DYNF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources