Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs VHT: how they differ

CGGR and VHT hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and VHT returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Vanguard Health Care Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VHT hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and VHT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRVHT
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%14.07%
Intuitive Surgical Inc1.68%2.39%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc1.56%1.80%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc0.76%0.63%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.56%5.46%
Amgen Inc0.53%2.87%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.53%2.93%
HCA Healthcare Inc0.45%0.96%
Mettler-Toledo International Inc0.33%0.38%
Guardant Health Inc0.25%0.23%
Moderna Inc0.39%0.23%
Ionis Pharmaceuticals Inc0.36%0.19%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in VHT
Meta Platforms Inc 7.09%Johnson & Johnson 8.48%
Tesla Inc 5.85%AbbVie Inc 6.10%
Broadcom Inc 5.40%Merck & Co Inc 4.67%
NVIDIA Corp 5.16%Gilead Sciences Inc 2.64%
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%Abbott Laboratories 2.36%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%Pfizer Inc 2.36%
Alphabet Inc 3.36%Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 1.84%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%Danaher Corp 1.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and VHT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
VHT
Vanguard Health Care Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalVanguard
What it isGrowthHealth Care
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+21.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%85.6%
Holdings89401

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

VHT in plain words

VHT is an index equity fund tracking the Health Care. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 86% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 401 positions, with the top ten at 52.0%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 19, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VHT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and VHT returned +21.6%, so VHT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or VHT?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and VHT charges 0.09%, so VHT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and VHT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 86% of VHT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against VHT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against VHT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-VHT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources