Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs SPMO: how they differ

CGGR and SPMO hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SPMO hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and SPMO both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRSPMO
Broadcom Inc5.40%7.58%
NVIDIA Corp5.16%8.46%
Micron Technology Inc4.86%10.72%
Alphabet Inc3.36%3.81%
Alphabet Inc3.06%4.81%
Intel Corp1.19%2.95%
KLA Corp1.17%1.39%
General Electric Co1.11%1.63%
Amphenol Corp0.85%1.30%
Philip Morris International Inc0.62%1.29%
Caterpillar Inc0.55%2.60%
Welltower Inc0.51%0.76%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in SPMO
Meta Platforms Inc 7.09%Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14%
Tesla Inc 5.85%Johnson & Johnson 3.85%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%Lam Research Corp. 3.54%
Amazon.com Inc 2.69%Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78%
Visa Inc 2.34%Sandisk Corp. 2.46%
TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%
Netflix Inc 1.85%Applied Materials, Inc. 1.77%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and SPMO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalInvesco
What it isGrowthS&P 500 Momentum
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+24.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+7.0 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.13%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%100.0%
Holdings8999

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SPMO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SPMO?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against SPMO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources