Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs ONEQ: how they differ

CGGR and ONEQ hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and ONEQ hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and ONEQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRONEQ
NVIDIA Corp5.16%11.24%
Broadcom Inc5.40%4.64%
Microsoft Corp4.38%7.32%
Tesla Inc5.85%3.58%
Alphabet Inc3.36%4.48%
Alphabet Inc3.06%4.85%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%3.03%
Amazon.com Inc2.69%6.37%
Micron Technology Inc4.86%2.38%
Apple Inc1.79%10.04%
Intel Corp1.19%1.25%
Netflix Inc1.85%0.79%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in ONEQ
Visa Inc 2.34%WALMART INC 2.02%
TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.84%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.81%LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.87%
Cloudflare Inc 1.65%PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.78%
SK hynix Inc 1.62%APPLIED MATERIALS INC 0.78%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.48%TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 0.60%
General Electric Co 1.11%QUALCOMM INC 0.58%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalFidelity
What it isGrowthNasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+20.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+3.1 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.21%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%87.4%
Holdings891022

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

ONEQ in plain words

ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or ONEQ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or ONEQ?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against ONEQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources