Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs FBCG: how they differ

CGGR and FBCG hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FBCG hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and FBCG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRFBCG
NVIDIA Corp5.16%14.62%
Microsoft Corp4.38%5.20%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%3.90%
Broadcom Inc5.40%3.74%
Alphabet Inc3.06%9.10%
Amazon.com Inc2.69%8.43%
Netflix Inc1.85%2.23%
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%2.25%
Apple Inc1.79%9.64%
Tesla Inc5.85%1.45%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt1.48%1.12%
Micron Technology Inc4.86%0.82%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in FBCG
Alphabet Inc 3.36%MARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC 2.03%
TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.19%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS INC 1.03%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.68%CELESTICA INC 0.88%
SK hynix Inc 1.62%LUMENTUM HOLDINGS INC 0.82%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.56%SANDISK CORP/DE 0.82%
Intel Corp 1.19%GILEAD SCIENCES INC 0.69%
Bank of America Corp 1.05%SHARKNINJA INC 0.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalFidelity
What it isGrowthBlue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−0.2 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.57%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%86.8%
Holdings89214

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FBCG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FBCG?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and FBCG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 87% of FBCG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources