Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs COWZ: how they differ
CGGR and COWZ hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and COWZ hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | COWZ |
|---|---|---|
| Salesforce Inc | 0.89% | 1.76% |
| DR Horton Inc | 0.79% | 1.21% |
| EOG Resources Inc | 0.77% | 1.23% |
| Uber Technologies Inc | 0.55% | 2.01% |
| HCA Healthcare Inc | 0.45% | 1.65% |
| Diamondback Energy Inc | 0.40% | 1.99% |
| United Airlines Holdings Inc | 0.34% | 0.83% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in COWZ |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | QUALCOMM Inc 2.67% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | Altria Group Inc 2.21% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | ConocoPhillips 2.17% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | CVS Health Corp 2.16% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Ford Motor Co 2.01% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Pfizer Inc 2.00% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | Newmont Corp 1.93% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Pacer |
| What it is | Growth | US Cash Cows 100 |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +23.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +5.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.49% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 95.8% |
| Holdings | 89 | 100 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
COWZ in plain words
COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or COWZ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or COWZ?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and COWZ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 96% of COWZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources