Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs VWO: how they differ

CGBL and VWO hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VWO returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and VWO hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in VWO
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 14.73%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%Tencent Holdings Ltd 3.28%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 2.57%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%Delta Electronics Inc 1.18%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%MediaTek Inc 1.07%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%Reliance Industries Ltd 0.90%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%HDFC Bank Ltd 0.81%
Apple Inc 2.00%Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd 0.75%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

CGBL and VWO on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
VWO
Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalVanguard
What it isCore BalancedEmerging markets
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+15.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−1.9 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%0.0%
Holdings776355

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

VWO in plain words

VWO is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +15.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 6355 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or VWO?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and VWO returned +15.6%, so VWO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or VWO?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and VWO charges 0.06%, so VWO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and VWO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of VWO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against VWO, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against VWO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-VWO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources