Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs VPL: how they differ
CGBL and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGBL | Only in VPL |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | SK hynix Inc 4.12% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Toyota Motor Corp 1.74% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | BHP Group Ltd 1.66% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Hitachi Ltd 1.18% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Advantest Corp 1.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Vanguard |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Pacific Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +36.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 77 | 2335 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
VPL in plain words
VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or VPL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or VPL?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and VPL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of VPL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources