Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs SPMO: how they differ
CGBL and SPMO hold 18% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and SPMO hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | SPMO |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 4.57% | 7.58% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.78% | 3.81% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.23% | 10.72% |
| Philip Morris International Inc | 2.07% | 1.29% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 1.25% | 1.33% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.19% | 8.46% |
| KLA Corp | 1.08% | 1.39% |
| Intel Corp | 0.91% | 2.95% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0.74% | 0.83% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.58% | 2.60% |
| General Electric Co | 0.52% | 1.63% |
| Quanta Services Inc | 0.43% | 0.48% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in SPMO |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Alphabet Inc. 4.81% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.14% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Johnson & Johnson 3.85% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Lam Research Corp. 3.54% |
| Microsoft Corp 1.96% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 2.78% |
| ATI Inc 1.23% | Sandisk Corp. 2.46% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.20% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 2.02% |
| Booking Holdings Inc 1.10% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Invesco |
| What it is | Core Balanced | S&P 500 Momentum |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +24.5% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +7.0 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.13% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 99 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
SPMO in plain words
SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SPMO?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and SPMO returned +24.5%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or SPMO?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and SPMO charges 0.13%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and SPMO overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 100% of SPMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against SPMO, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-SPMO Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources