Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs SPHQ: how they differ
CGBL and SPHQ hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and SPHQ returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and SPHQ hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 2.00% | 4.51% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 1.25% | 3.15% |
| KLA Corp | 1.08% | 3.27% |
| Visa Inc | 0.92% | 4.69% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0.74% | 2.28% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.58% | 3.78% |
| General Electric Co | 0.52% | 4.16% |
| Mastercard Inc | 0.51% | 4.32% |
| Costco Wholesale Corp | 0.32% | 4.82% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in SPHQ |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Lam Research Corp. 4.10% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.54% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Procter & Gamble Co. (The) 3.46% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Coca-Cola Co. (The) 3.34% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Merck & Co., Inc. 2.87% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | Applied Materials, Inc. 2.80% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Western Digital Corp. 2.15% |
| Microsoft Corp 1.96% | QUALCOMM Inc. 2.03% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Invesco |
| What it is | Core Balanced | S&P 500 Quality |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 99.9% |
| Holdings | 77 | 99 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
SPHQ in plain words
SPHQ is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 40.7%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jun 30, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SPHQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and SPHQ returned +17.4%, so SPHQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or SPHQ?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and SPHQ charges 0.15%, so SPHQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and SPHQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 100% of SPHQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 8% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against SPHQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-SPHQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources