Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs SCHH: how they differ
CGBL and SCHH hold 0% of their weight in the same names.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Schwab U.S. REIT ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and SCHH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGBL | Only in SCHH |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Welltower Inc 9.64% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Prologis Inc 8.97% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Equinix Inc 4.89% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Simon Property Group Inc 4.48% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Digital Realty Trust Inc 4.36% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | American Tower Corp 4.35% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Realty Income Corp 4.00% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Public Storage 3.41% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | SCHH Schwab U.S. REIT ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Schwab |
| What it is | Core Balanced | US REIT |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +9.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −7.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 74.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 117 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
SCHH in plain words
SCHH is an index equity fund tracking the US REIT. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 74% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 117 positions, with the top ten at 49.8%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Jul 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SCHH?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and SCHH returned +9.8%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or SCHH?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and SCHH charges 0.07%, so SCHH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and SCHH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 74% of SCHH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against SCHH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-SCHH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources