Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs ONEQ: how they differ
CGBL and ONEQ hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and ONEQ hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 4.57% | 4.64% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.78% | 4.48% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.23% | 2.38% |
| Apple Inc | 2.00% | 10.04% |
| Microsoft Corp | 1.96% | 7.32% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.19% | 11.24% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 3.03% |
| Intel Corp | 0.91% | 1.25% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 0.81% | 6.37% |
| KLA Corp | 1.08% | 0.55% |
| Amgen Inc | 0.54% | 0.40% |
| Gilead Sciences Inc | 0.74% | 0.36% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in ONEQ |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | ALPHABET INC 4.85% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | TESLA INC 3.58% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | WALMART INC 2.02% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 1.84% |
| GE Vernova Inc 1.25% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.04% |
| ATI Inc 1.23% | LAM RESEARCH CORP 0.87% |
| Boeing Co/The 1.07% | NETFLIX INC 0.79% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 1.03% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Fidelity |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Nasdaq Composite |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +20.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.21% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 87.4% |
| Holdings | 77 | 1022 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or ONEQ?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and ONEQ returned +20.6%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or ONEQ?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and ONEQ charges 0.21%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and ONEQ overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 87% of ONEQ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 21% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against ONEQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-ONEQ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources