Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs IXUS: how they differ
CGBL and IXUS hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and IXUS returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and IXUS hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | IXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Canadian Natural Resources Ltd | 0.56% | 0.23% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp | 1.03% | 0.13% |
| Franco-Nevada Corp | 0.89% | 0.10% |
| Lundin Mining Corp | 0.65% | 0.04% |
| First Quantum Minerals Ltd | 0.45% | 0.04% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in IXUS |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 4.04% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | ASML Holding N.V. 1.32% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | SK hynix Inc. 1.15% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Tencent Holdings Limited 0.91% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.69% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 0.67% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Novartis AG 0.66% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | IXUS iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Core MSCI Total International Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +22.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +4.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.07% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 4185 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
IXUS in plain words
IXUS is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Total International Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4185 positions, with the top ten at 12.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or IXUS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and IXUS returned +22.2%, so IXUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or IXUS?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and IXUS charges 0.07%, so IXUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and IXUS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of IXUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against IXUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-IXUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources