Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs HYG: how they differ

CGBL is an equity index fund and HYG a bond index fund, and over the year CGBL returned more, +9.9% against +2.9%.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF.

CGBL and HYG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitaliShares
What it isCore BalancedUS high yield bonds
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+2.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−14.6 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.49%
Holdings77not filed

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

HYG in plain words

HYG is a bond fund tracking the US high yield bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or HYG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and HYG returned +2.9%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or HYG?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and HYG charges 0.49%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against HYG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against HYG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-HYG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources