Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs FLKR: how they differ

CGBL and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in FLKR
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%SK HYNIX INC 23.85%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%
Apple Inc 2.00%SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

CGBL and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
FLKR
Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalFranklin
What it isCore BalancedFTSE South Korea
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+146.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts+128.5 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%0.0%
Holdings77157

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or FLKR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or FLKR?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and FLKR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of FLKR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against FLKR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against FLKR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-FLKR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources