Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs EEM: how they differ
CGBL and EEM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGBL | Only in EEM |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | SK hynix Inc. 6.65% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | MediaTek Inc. 1.62% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Emerging markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +32.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +14.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.72% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 1245 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
EEM in plain words
EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or EEM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or EEM?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and EEM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of EEM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources