Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VBK?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or VBK?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs VBK: how they differ

BSV and VBK hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VBK returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and VBK hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in VBK
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd 1.27%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	REVOLUTION Medicines Inc 1.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Astera Labs Inc 1.05%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Natera Inc 1.04%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Twilio Inc 0.88%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Casey's General Stores Inc 0.83%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Carpenter Technology Corp 0.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Curtiss-Wright Corp 0.79%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and VBK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	VBK Vanguard Small-Cap Growth Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Vanguard
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Small-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+13.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−3.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.05%
Holdings	3185	545

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

VBK in plain words

VBK is an index equity fund tracking the Small-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 10% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 545 positions, with the top ten at 9.3%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VBK?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VBK returned +13.8%, so VBK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or VBK?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and VBK charges 0.05%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against VBK, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against VBK, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-VBK Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources