Which returned more over the last year, BSV or SPHD?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so SPHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or SPHD?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs SPHD: how they differ

BSV and SPHD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and SPHD returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and SPHD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in SPHD
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Verizon Communications Inc. 3.49%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	Altria Group, Inc. 3.45%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Healthpeak Properties, Inc. 3.24%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Kraft Heinz Co. (The) 3.03%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Pfizer Inc. 2.99%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Franklin Resources, Inc. 2.82%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	VICI Properties Inc. 2.68%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	ONEOK, Inc. 2.66%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BSV and SPHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Invesco
What it is	Short-Term Bond	S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+8.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−8.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.30%
Holdings	3185	49

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

SPHD in plain words

SPHD is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +8.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 49 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%. It sat 4.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or SPHD?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and SPHD returned +8.6%, so SPHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or SPHD?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and SPHD charges 0.30%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against SPHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against SPHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-SPHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources