Which returned more over the last year, BSV or EEM?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or EEM?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs EEM: how they differ

BSV and EEM hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EEM returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and EEM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in EEM
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 14.28%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	SK hynix Inc. 6.65%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Tencent Holdings Limited 2.71%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Alibaba Group Holding Limited 2.08%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	MediaTek Inc. 1.62%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.17%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.90%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.85%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BSV and EEM on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	EEM iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Emerging markets
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+32.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+14.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.72%
Holdings	3185	1245

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

EEM in plain words

EEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.72% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1245 positions, with the top ten at 38.9%. It sat 4.7% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or EEM?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and EEM returned +32.3%, so EEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or EEM?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and EEM charges 0.72%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against EEM, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against EEM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-EEM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources