Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BOXX vs DBMF: how they differ
BOXX is a short-term Treasury fund and DBMF an equity index fund, and over the year DBMF returned more, +25.4% against +4.0%.
Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF.
| BOXX Alpha Architect 1-3 Month Box ETF | DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Alpha | iMGP |
| What it is | 1-3 Month Box | iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.0% | +25.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −13.5 pts | +7.9 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.85% |
BOXX in plain words
BOXX is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 1-3 Month Box. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year.
DBMF in plain words
DBMF is an index equity fund tracking the iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +25.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOXX or DBMF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOXX returned +4.0% and DBMF returned +25.4%, so DBMF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BOXX or DBMF?
- BOXX charges 0.19% a year and DBMF charges 0.85%, so BOXX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOXX against DBMF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOXX-DBMF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources