Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BOND vs VPL: how they differ
BOND and VPL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VPL returned more over the year.
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BOND and VPL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in BOND | Only in VPL |
|---|---|
| UMBS, TBA 4.80% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 6.06% |
| PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52% | SK hynix Inc 4.12% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.98% | Commonwealth Bank of Australia 1.80% |
| United States Treasury 2.93% | Toyota Motor Corp 1.74% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.36% | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 1.69% |
| United States Treasury 2.22% | BHP Group Ltd 1.66% |
| UMBS, TBA 2.19% | Hitachi Ltd 1.18% |
| UMBS, TBA 1.96% | Advantest Corp 1.16% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | VPL Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Vanguard |
| What it is | Active Bond Exchange-Traded | Pacific Stock |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | +36.9% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.6 pts | +19.4 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.07% |
| Holdings | 1565 | 2335 |
BOND in plain words
BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
VPL in plain words
VPL is an index equity fund tracking the Pacific Stock. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +36.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2335 positions, with the top ten at 21.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BOND or VPL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and VPL returned +36.9%, so VPL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, BOND or VPL?
- BOND charges 0.54% a year and VPL charges 0.07%, so VPL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against VPL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-VPL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources