Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BOND vs LYTE: how they differ
BOND and LYTE are measured over different days, and BOND charges 0.54% against 0.65%.
PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF.
| BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund | LYTE Roundhill Photonics & Optics ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Thematic ETF |
| Issuer | PIMCO | Roundhill |
| What it is | Active Bond Exchange-Traded | Photonics and optics |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.1% | −0.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | −0.6% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −17.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.54% | 0.65% |
| Holdings | 1565 | not filed |
BOND in plain words
BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
LYTE in plain words
LYTE has no public holdings filing captured yet. Since it launched on Aug 6, 2026 the fund returned −0.4% with distributions reinvested against −0.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was about even. It sits 11.4% below its all-time high of Aug 17, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, BOND or LYTE?
- BOND charges 0.54% a year and LYTE charges 0.65%, so BOND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- Are BOND and LYTE the same kind of fund?
- No. BOND is an index ETF and LYTE is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against LYTE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-LYTE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources