Which returned more over the last year, BOND or ILF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or ILF?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ILF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs ILF: how they differ

BOND and ILF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ILF returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares Latin America 40 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and ILF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in ILF
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	VALE S.A. 8.48%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.25%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 7.11%
United States Treasury 2.93%	Grupo Mexico, S.A.B. de C.V. 5.68%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 5.19%
United States Treasury 2.22%	Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 4.83%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	CREDICORP LTD. 4.26%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V. 4.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and ILF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	Latin America 40
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+33.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+15.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.47%
Holdings	1565	45

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

ILF in plain words

ILF is an index equity fund tracking the Latin America 40. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +33.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 55.1%. It sat 4.4% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or ILF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and ILF returned +33.4%, so ILF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or ILF?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and ILF charges 0.47%, so ILF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against ILF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against ILF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-ILF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources