Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FLKR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or FLKR?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs FLKR: how they differ

BOND and FLKR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FLKR returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FLKR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in FLKR
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	SK HYNIX INC 23.85%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 15.68%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 13.10%
United States Treasury 2.93%	SK SQUARE CO LTD 3.75%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	SAMSUNG ELECTRO MECHANICS 3.64%
United States Treasury 2.22%	HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY 2.14%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	KB FINANCIAL GROUP INC 1.75%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD 1.73%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and FLKR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Franklin
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	FTSE South Korea
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+146.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+128.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.09%
Holdings	1565	157

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FLKR in plain words

FLKR is an index equity fund tracking the FTSE South Korea. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +146.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 68.2%. It sat 13.6% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FLKR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FLKR returned +146.0%, so FLKR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FLKR?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and FLKR charges 0.09%, so FLKR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against FLKR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against FLKR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-FLKR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources