Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FBCG?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or FBCG?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so BOND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs FBCG: how they differ

BOND and FBCG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FBCG returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and FBCG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in FBCG
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	NVIDIA CORP 14.62%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	APPLE INC 9.64%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	ALPHABET INC 9.10%
United States Treasury 2.93%	AMAZON.COM INC 8.43%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	MICROSOFT CORP 5.20%
United States Treasury 2.22%	META PLATFORMS INC 3.90%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	BROADCOM INC 3.74%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	ELI LILLY and CO 2.25%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and FBCG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Fidelity
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	Blue Chip Growth
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+17.3%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−0.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.57%
Holdings	1565	214

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

FBCG in plain words

FBCG is an index equity fund tracking the Blue Chip Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.57% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 214 positions, with the top ten at 61.2%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or FBCG?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and FBCG returned +17.3%, so FBCG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or FBCG?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and FBCG charges 0.57%, so BOND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against FBCG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against FBCG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-FBCG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources