Which returned more over the last year, BOND or COWZ?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or COWZ?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs COWZ: how they differ

BOND and COWZ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and COWZ returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and COWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in COWZ
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	QUALCOMM Inc 2.67%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	Altria Group Inc 2.21%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	ConocoPhillips 2.17%
United States Treasury 2.93%	CVS Health Corp 2.16%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.03%
United States Treasury 2.22%	Ford Motor Co 2.01%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	Uber Technologies Inc 2.01%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	Pfizer Inc 2.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BOND and COWZ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	Pacer
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	US Cash Cows 100
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+23.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	+5.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.49%
Holdings	1565	100

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

COWZ in plain words

COWZ is an index equity fund tracking the US Cash Cows 100. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +23.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.49% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 3.2% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or COWZ?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and COWZ returned +23.4%, so COWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or COWZ?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and COWZ charges 0.49%, so COWZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against COWZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against COWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BOND-COWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources