Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or XOVR?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so XOVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BNDX or XOVR?

BNDX charges 0.07% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BNDX vs XOVR: how they differ

BNDX and XOVR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XOVR returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and XOVR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BNDX	Only in XOVR
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%	Nvidia Corp 9.48%
Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%	Astera Labs Inc 7.75%
Canadian Government Bond 0.13%	Alphabet Inc 6.53%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	Meta Platforms Inc 4.47%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	Applovin Corp 3.95%
Canadian Government Bond 0.09%	Natera Inc 3.70%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	Veeva Systems Inc 3.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BNDX and XOVR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund	XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	ERShares
What it is	Total International Bond	Private-Public Crossover
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	0.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	−17.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.75%
Holdings	6707	32

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

XOVR in plain words

XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or XOVR?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so XOVR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or XOVR?: BNDX charges 0.07% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BNDX against XOVR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BNDX against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BNDX-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources