Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or XLE?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BNDX or XLE?

BNDX charges 0.07% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BNDX vs XLE: how they differ

BNDX and XLE hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLE returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund and State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and XLE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BNDX	Only in XLE
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%	Exxon Mobil Corp 22.71%
Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%	Chevron Corp 16.12%
Canadian Government Bond 0.13%	ConocoPhillips 6.58%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	Williams Cos Inc/The 5.04%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	Valero Energy Corp 4.65%
Canadian Government Bond 0.09%	Marathon Petroleum Corp 4.49%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	EOG Resources Inc 4.15%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	SLB Ltd 4.10%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BNDX and XLE on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund	XLE State Street(R) Energy Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	State Street
What it is	Total International Bond	Energy
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+50.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	+33.2 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.08%
Holdings	6707	21

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

XLE in plain words

XLE is an index equity fund tracking the Energy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +50.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 21 positions, with the top ten at 75.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or XLE?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and XLE returned +50.7%, so XLE returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or XLE?: BNDX charges 0.07% a year and XLE charges 0.08%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BNDX against XLE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BNDX against XLE, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BNDX-XLE Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources