Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or IWF?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BNDX or IWF?

BNDX charges 0.07% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BNDX vs IWF: how they differ

BNDX and IWF hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IWF returned more over the year.

Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BNDX and IWF hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BNDX	Only in IWF
French Republic Government Bond OAT 0.18%	NVIDIA CORPORATION 13.85%
Bundesschatzanweisungen 0.14%	APPLE INC. 6.72%
Canadian Government Bond 0.13%	ALPHABET INC. 6.18%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	BROADCOM INC. 5.21%
Canadian Government Bond 0.10%	ALPHABET INC. 4.98%
Canadian Government Bond 0.09%	MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.11%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 3.86%
Canadian Government Bond 0.08%	TESLA, INC. 3.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

BNDX and IWF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund	IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	Total International Bond	Russell 1000 growth
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+7.0%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	−10.5 pts
Expense ratio	0.07%	0.18%
Holdings	6707	368

BNDX in plain words

BNDX is a bond fund tracking the Total International Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year.

IWF in plain words

IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BNDX or IWF?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BNDX returned −0.7% and IWF returned +7.0%, so IWF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BNDX or IWF?: BNDX charges 0.07% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so BNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BNDX against IWF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BNDX against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BNDX-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources