Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

BND vs XLK

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

BND and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
XLK
State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerVanguardState Street
What it isUS aggregate bondsTechnology
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+43.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.7 pts+23.4 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.08%
Holdingsn/a74

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

XLK in plain words

XLK is a index equity fund tracking Technology. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +43.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or XLK?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and XLK returned +43.4%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or XLK?
BND charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against XLK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-XLK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources