Which returned more over the last year, AGG or XLK?

In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +1.3% and XLK returned +43.4%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, AGG or XLK?

AGG charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

AGG vs XLK

Name: ETFIQ comparison of AGG and XLK
Creator: ETFIQ
License: https://etfiq.com/standards/

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

AGG and XLK on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	XLK State Street(R) Technology Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sits	Core fund	Core fund
Issuer	iShares	State Street
What it is	US aggregate bonds	Technology
Total return, 1 year	+1.3%	+43.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+20.0%	+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.6 pts	+23.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.08%
Holdings	n/a	74

AGG in plain words

AGG is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

XLK in plain words

XLK is a index equity fund tracking Technology. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +43.4% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 74 positions, with the top ten at 64.5%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Jun 2, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or XLK?: In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +1.3% and XLK returned +43.4%, so XLK returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AGG or XLK?: AGG charges 0.03% a year and XLK charges 0.08%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against XLK, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-XLK.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources