Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

AGG vs IJH

iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

AGG and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AGG
iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isUS aggregate bondsS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+16.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.6 pts−3.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Holdingsn/a400

AGG in plain words

AGG is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

IJH in plain words

IJH is a index equity fund tracking S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +16.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AGG or IJH?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AGG returned +1.3% and IJH returned +16.9%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AGG or IJH?
AGG charges 0.03% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so AGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AGG against IJH, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/AGG-IJH.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources