Get alerts

Data as of Sep 4, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

BND vs IJH

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

BND and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore fundCore fund
IssuerVanguardiShares
What it isUS aggregate bondsS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+1.3%+16.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+20.0%+20.0%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.7 pts−3.0 pts
Expense ratio0.03%0.05%
Holdingsn/a400

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +1.3% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

IJH in plain words

IJH is a index equity fund tracking S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 4, 2026 it returned +16.9% with distributions reinvested, against +20.0% for the S&P 500 and +25.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 4, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or IJH?
In the year to Sep 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned +1.3% and IJH returned +16.9%, so IJH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or IJH?
BND charges 0.03% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against IJH, data as of Sep 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-IJH.html Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. ETFIQ publishes the same fields for every fund and suggests no allocation. Standards and sources