Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
BND vs PVAL: how they differ
BND is a bond index fund and PVAL an equity index fund, and over the year PVAL returned more, +28.4% against −0.7%.
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF.
| BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund | PVAL Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Vanguard | Putnam |
| What it is | US aggregate bonds | Putnam Focused Large Cap Value |
| Total return, 1 year | −0.7% | +28.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −18.2 pts | +10.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | not published |
| Holdings | not filed | 45 |
BND in plain words
BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.
PVAL in plain words
PVAL is an index equity fund tracking the Putnam Focused Large Cap Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +28.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 45 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, BND or PVAL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and PVAL returned +28.4%, so PVAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against PVAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-PVAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources