Which returned more over the last year, BND or EWT?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BND or EWT?

BND charges 0.03% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BND vs EWT: how they differ

BND is a bond index fund and EWT an equity index fund, and over the year EWT returned more, +84.9% against −0.7%.

Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund and iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF.

BND and EWT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BND Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund	EWT iShares MSCI Taiwan ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	iShares
What it is	US aggregate bonds	MSCI Taiwan
Total return, 1 year	−0.7%	+84.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−18.2 pts	+67.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.59%
Holdings	not filed	85

BND in plain words

BND is a bond fund tracking the US aggregate bonds. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.8% below its high of Aug 6, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

EWT in plain words

EWT is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +84.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 85 positions, with the top ten at 51.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BND or EWT?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BND returned −0.7% and EWT returned +84.9%, so EWT returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BND or EWT?: BND charges 0.03% a year and EWT charges 0.59%, so BND is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BND against EWT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BND against EWT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BND-EWT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources