Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BINC vs PULS: how they differ

BINC and PULS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and PULS returned more over the year.

iShares Flexible Income Active ETF and PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BINC and PULS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BINC and PULS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBINCPULS
Home Owner Mortgage Enhanced Securuties 0.07%0.07%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CO0.06%0.44%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC0.05%0.40%
SALESFORCE INC0.04%0.42%
New Residential Mortgage Loan Trust0.03%0.06%
Affirm Inc0.02%0.37%
Verus Securitization Trust0.02%0.06%
Trinitas CLO Ltd0.02%0.27%
Venture CDO Ltd0.02%0.04%
BRAVO Residential Funding Trust0.01%0.17%
Verus Securitization Trust0.01%0.06%
Verus Securitization Trust0.07%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BINCOnly in PULS
UMBS, TBA 5.13%PGIM ETF Trust 2.38%
UMBS, TBA 2.81%GLENCORE FUNDING LLC 0.98%
UMBS, TBA 2.14%Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. 0.87%
UMBS, TBA 2.10%ABN AMRO BANK NV 0.75%
UMBS, TBA 1.52%BX TRUST 2022-LBA6 0.68%
iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate B 1.02%FEDERATION DES CAISSES DESJARDINS DU QUE 0.67%
iShares iBoxx USD Investment Grade Corpo 0.64%BX TRUST 2018-BILT 0.56%
UMBS, TBA 0.53%BROADCOM INC 0.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

BINC and PULS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BINC
iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
PULS
PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesPGIM
What it isFlexible IncomePGIM Ultra Short Bond
Total return, 1 year+2.0%+4.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−15.5 pts−13.3 pts
Expense rationot published0.15%
Holdings4124553

BINC in plain words

BINC is an index equity fund tracking the Flexible Income. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 2% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 4124 positions, with the top ten at 17.4%.

PULS in plain words

PULS is a cash and treasury bills tracking the PGIM Ultra Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BINC or PULS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BINC returned +2.0% and PULS returned +4.2%, so PULS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BINC against PULS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BINC against PULS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BINC-PULS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources